Faith and Reason—Friends, Foes or Strangers?

March 1, 2017

Share this

On the first day of class when Eric Watson, S.J., walks in wearing a collar and clerics, his new students sometimes look confused, seemingly wondering whether they inadvertently registered for a theology course. While Father Watson certainly knows his way around theology, he is, by trade, an associate professor of chemistry. 

His students are not alone in thinking that priest-slash-scientist is an odd combination鈥攊f not an outright contradiction. 

This idea that science and religion just don鈥檛 mix was the starting point of a presentation Father Watson gave Feb. 28, titled 鈥淩eflections of a Jesuit Scientist.鈥 (The talk was part of the Institute of Catholic Thought and Culture鈥檚 Jesuits in Science Series.) 

Speaking to a standing-room-only crowd in Wyckoff Auditorium, Father Watson (right) invited attendees to consider for themselves the nature of the relationship between faith and reason: 鈥淒o they engage, oppose or ignore each other? Are they friends or foes or strangers?鈥 

He pointed to a Pew Research Center study in which a majority of respondents鈥攏early 60 percent鈥攂elieve science and religion are often in conflict. (Interestingly, a much smaller percentage responded that their own beliefs conflict with science.) The media, Father Watson said, is significantly responsible for reinforcing this perception. He quoted Oxford University biochemist and Anglican priest Alister McGrath, who said, 鈥淭here is a world of difference between saying that 鈥榮cience and religion are necessarily in conflict鈥 (which is historically indefensible) and 鈥榮cience and religion are sometimes in conflict and sometimes work together鈥 (which historically is true but will seem unexciting to many)." 

Conflict, Father Watson added, is actually just one of four models by which the relationship between faith and reason can be understood. He identified the other three as independence (science and religion are 鈥減olite strangers鈥 operating in a sort of parallel, peaceful coexistence); complementarity (religion and science are in dialogue, informing and keeping one another honest, while still pretty much autonomous); and integration (science and religion are viewed cohesively through the prism of a personal relationship with a creative, active and loving God).

Father Watson deftly drew upon the wisdom and insights of scientists and theologians alike to elaborate and critique each model. Speaking from his personal experience as a priest and professor on campus, he shared his views on how 香港六合彩现场开奖 fosters an integration of religion and science. 鈥淛esuit education promotes dialogue between faith and culture, which includes dialogue between faith and science.鈥 Along those lines, he added that 鈥淚t鈥檚 rewarding for me to see some of my students at Mass on Sunday and then at class on Monday.鈥

He also spoke with passion about his research. 鈥淭his is what I make,鈥 he said, pointing to a slide on the screen, 鈥渢riple-decker organometallic compounds. They鈥檙e interesting鈥hey鈥檙e colorful鈥hey have eventual applications鈥ut really, I love these things because they鈥檙e beautiful.鈥 

鈥淭here鈥檚 a lot of harmony,鈥 Fr. Watson concluded, 鈥渂etween my life as a teacher, a priest and a researcher.鈥